|
Rohstoffspiegel: 11.10.08 21:21 Die Rohstoff-Woche -... |
|
Frank Sterzbach: 11.10.08 12:34 Crash: Was tun? |
|
Stephan Heibel: 10.10.08 23:23 Fehlende Rahmenbedingungen... |
| Letzter Kurs: | 0,023 EUR  |
WKN: | A0ER3Y | ||||
| Veränd. abs.: | -0,002 EUR | Symbol: | O5Y | ||||
| Veränd. in %: | -8,00 % | ISIN: | US72766F1093 | ||||
| Volumen | 276.800 Stück | Typ: | Aktie | ||||
| Geld/Brief: |
|
| Thema eröffnet von: | Bonea | Beiträge: | 646 | Bewertung (19): |  |
|
| am: | 07.06.07 09:37 | Gelesen gesamt: | 15870 | |||
| Letzter Beitrag von: | SHEsaTrader | Gelesen heute: | 18 | |||
| am: | 29.09.08 13:57 |
|
Von Stargold123 | Erstellt am: 04.04.08 11:30 | Beitrag Nr.: 128.564 | Weitere Beiträge |
| Diesen Beitrag: | ||||
meine Meinung, aus meiner Sicht, so wie ich das sehe ;-)
|
Von Illuminati | Erstellt am: 04.04.08 16:38 | Beitrag Nr.: 128.649 | Weitere Beiträge |
| Diesen Beitrag: | ||||
|
Von Pogea | Erstellt am: 04.04.08 22:30 | Beitrag Nr.: 128.675 | Weitere Beiträge |
| Diesen Beitrag: | ||||
. Mr. Langston reported that he had no disagreements with the Company. Also effective March 31, 2008, James E. Jack, who is 66 years of age, was appointed as a director of the Company to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Mr. Langston. From December 2006 until the end of March 2008, Mr. Jack served as the Managing Director of the Baron Group, USA, LLC, an international investment banking firm based in Hong Kong that provides strategic consulting and banking services to large and mid-cap companies, primarily in Asia and North America. In June 2006, Mr. Jack formed J. E. Jack & Partners, LLC, a financial advisory and consulting firm with respect to which Mr. Jack continues to serve as a principal. From the autumn of 2003 to June 2006, he was a principal in PentaCap LLC, another financial advisory and consulting firm. From May 2001 to the summer of 2003, Mr. Jack served as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Medallion Financial Corp., a publicly traded company. Mr. Jack received a B.B.A. in accounting from the University of Notre Dame, an M.B.A from the Edwin L. Cox School of Business, Southern Methodist University, and an honorary Doctor of Laws from St. Mary’s College, Notre Dame, Indiana.
|
|
Von Pogea | Erstellt am: 04.04.08 22:34 | Beitrag Nr.: 128.677 | Weitere Beiträge |
| Diesen Beitrag: | ||||
|
|
Von Stargold123 | Erstellt am: 07.04.08 08:51 | Beitrag Nr.: 128.724 | Weitere Beiträge |
| Diesen Beitrag: | ||||
meine Meinung, aus meiner Sicht, so wie ich das sehe ;-)
|
|
Von Pogea | Erstellt am: 08.04.08 18:43 | Beitrag Nr.: 128.945 | Weitere Beiträge |
| Diesen Beitrag: | ||||
|
|
Von Pogea | Erstellt am: 09.04.08 22:24 | Beitrag Nr.: 129.042 | Weitere Beiträge |
| Diesen Beitrag: | ||||
entered into an Agreement and Plan of Acquisition (the “Exchange Agreement&rdquo with UTEK Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“UTEK&rdquo, and UTEK’s wholly-owned subsidiary Enhanced Oil Recovery Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Enhanced Oil&rdquo. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, the Company acquired from UTEK effective March 31, 2008 all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Enhanced Oil in exchange for (i) 100,000 shares of the Company’s Series F Convertible Preferred Stock that is convertible, no earlier than six months and no later than twelve months from the date of the Exchange Agreement, into $1,440,000 worth of shares of the Company’s common stock based on the average of the five day closing price of the Company’s common stock prior to the conversion date, (ii) two year warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $.25 per share and (iii) two year warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $.50 per share. The principal assets of Enhanced Oil at the time of closing consisted of a Patent License Agreement with the University of Texas System and approximately $300,000 in cash. Pursuant to such Patent License Agreement, Enhanced Oil has the exclusive worldwide license rights for the use of Patent No. 6,705,403 described as a production system and method for producing fluids from a well that includes a technology that utilizes a combination of an electrical submersible pump and a jet pump to separate liquid and gas streams. The potential benefit of this system is that it enables a submersible pump and a jet pump to be used in combination in a high gas-to-liquid ratio oil well without installing a gas vent line. The License Agreement also provides for (i) an upfront $60,000 fee that is to be paid by UTEK, (ii) an annual $1,000 maintenance fee, (iii) a royalty of 4% of all consideration received by the Licensee from license customers for the licensed product, (iv) a royalty of 4% of the net sales of the licensed product and (v) a use fee for each production well which is owned or managed by the Licensee or its affiliates at which the licensed product is installed. Prior to the consummation of the acquisition, there were no material relationships between UTEK and its officers, directors, affiliates, associates or stockholders, on the one hand, and the Company and its officers, directors, affiliates, associates or stockholders, on the other hand. The financial statements of Enhanced Oil required to be filed with this Current Report on Form 8-K and the pro forma combined financial statements of the Company required to be furnished with this Current Report on Form 8-K will be filed and furnished on or before June 16, 2008. . No advertising or general solicitation was employed in offering these securities. The offering and sale was made only to one accredited investor, and subsequent transfers were restricted in accordance with the requirements of the Act.
|
|
Von Stargold123 | Erstellt am: 10.04.08 14:38 | Beitrag Nr.: 129.076 | Weitere Beiträge |
| Diesen Beitrag: | ||||
meine Meinung, aus meiner Sicht, so wie ich das sehe ;-)
|
|
Von Stargold123 | Erstellt am: 10.04.08 14:58 | Beitrag Nr.: 129.079 | Weitere Beiträge |
| Diesen Beitrag: | ||||
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/137,846 entitled “DOWNHOLE PRODUCTION ASSEMBLY INCLUDING A SUBMERSIBLE PUMP AND A JET PUMP” filed Jun. 7, 1999, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Claims: What is claimed is:1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to pumping equipment. More particularly, the invention relates to, in one embodiment, a production system for producing fluids from a well that includes a jet pump and a submersible pump.
2. Description of the Related Art
The information described below is not admitted to be prior art by virtue of its inclusion in this Background section.
As the technology for offshore deep-water exploitation becomes available at a reasonable cost, the number of sub-sea completions in deep and ultra-deep waters is expected to increase significantly. Evidence of this expected increase in deep-water production may be seen in the large number of tracts in water deeper than 5000 feet that were leased in the recently completed Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) lease sales. FIG. 1 presents the evolution of the tracts receiving bids in the recent lease sales and clearly emphasizes the expectations of the oil companies. (The asterisk in FIG. 1 denotes years in which a royalty relief program was in effect.) FIG. 2 presents a bar graph that shows the increasing production (expressed in % increase by year) from the deep and ultra-deep waters in the Gulf of Mexico. Other important evidence of increased deep-water production may be seen in the increasing activity of Petrobras. The Brazilian Petroleum Company started the exploitation of the Campos Basin offshore Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1979 at water depths of 300 feet, and since then has worked continuously towards deeper waters where some important discoveries have been made. Today, high productivity wells have been producing steadily and successfully at water depths greater than 5000 feet in the Marlin and Albacore fields.
Production platforms are typically installed when producing from offshore wells. While the installation of a production platform in deep water is sometimes technically feasible, such an installation is more complicated, and thus more expensive, than installing a production platform in shallower water.
Consequently, the host production platforms in offshore petroleum production projects are usually installed in shallow water, which often requires a long flowline between the platform and the deep wells. With the wells located far from the host platform, the wellhead flowing pressures generally have to be maintained at a level sufficient to overcome high frictional losses plus the hydraulic head for the produced fluids to be able to flow back to the platform. The high wellhead pressure required to flow production back to the host platform will in turn tend to limit a pressure differential (or drawdown) that may be established at the reservoir. As a result, the production rates of the deep wells may be reduced to uneconomic levels.
A possible solution to the problem created by the installation of the host platform far from the production wells is the application of existing artificial-lift (AL) methods. AL methods supply the fluids produced from the well with sufficient energy to generate adequate drawdown at the formation while maintaining a high enough wellhead pressure to transport the fluids to the host platform at a desired flow rate. The AL method most commonly used for sub-sea offshore petroleum production is the gas lift (GL). A purpose of the GL method is to inject gas into the tubing string downhole in order to reduce the hydraulic head without increasing the friction losses so that the net result is an increase in the wellhead pressure for a fixed bottomhole pressure.
While the increase in the gas-liquid ratio (GLR) obtained with the GL method is highly beneficial for vertical multiphase flow, such an increase is not as helpful for horizontal flow. For long-distance horizontal multiphase flow, the net result of the increase in the GLR may be detrimental since the friction loss increases and there is little or no reduction in the hydraulic head. In addition, the increased GLR will create an operational problem with long-distance horizontal flow due to the instability of the slug flow that is expected to occur. Another problem with the GL method is that it requires an annulus lift-gas line, which for long distances will significantly increase the final cost of the project.
Pumping AL methods are also available for sub-sea applications. Such methods include the electrical submersible pump (ESP), the Progressing Cavity Pump (PCP), and the Jet Pump (JP). Present technology applies ESP's for pumping of liquid with small amounts of free gas (up to about 5% or so) while JP's are used to pump liquids using a liquid power fluid. An ESP typically includes a multistage centrifugal pump driven by a coupled electric motor. The pump may be installed inside the well at the end of the tubing string, and is typically situated at a certain depth below the fluid level. An electric cable connecting the surface transformer to the electric motor feeds electric power.
The JP is an AL method with no moving parts. The JP, which primarily consists of a body with a nozzle, a throat, and a diffuser, is set in a nipple inside the tubing string. Substantially clean power fluid is pumped down from the surface to the pump through the tubing. This power fluid passes through the nozzle, creating a low-pressure region connected to the pump intake so that the well fluid is suctioned into the throat region of the JP. The mixed fluid, i.e., power fluid plus produced fluids, exits the pump through the diffuser into the casing with sufficient head to overcome the hydraulic head plus the head losses.
To date, the majority of the pumping AL systems are being operated at conditions where there is a minimum of free gas present at the pump intake. As may be learned from Ref. 1 to Ref. 6, that free gas is, in many instances, detrimental to proper operation of these pumps. Consequently, it is not recommended to apply these systems without some provision for separation of the gas before reaching the pump intake. A requirement for the application of AL methods to sub-sea petroleum production is the necessity to operate relatively efficiently with a multiphase gas-liquid mixture because it is not desired, for economic reasons, to have an extra produced-gas flowline for each well. Without the annulus flowline, it is generally not possible to utilize the annular space as a downhole separator and to vent the gas at the casinghead.
The application of an ESP to a well having a high free-gas volume at the pump intake usually requires the installation of a gas separator. The use of a gas separator, however, may require the costly installation of an extra flow line to vent the separated gas to the host platform. Therefore, it would be desirable, in some embodiments, to design a production system that would allow an ESP to be used in a high free-gas well without requiring the installation of a vent line.
SUMMARYA production system may include a submersible pump and a jet pump. The submersible pump may be arranged within the well. The jet pump may be arranged within the well downstream of the submersible pump. The jet pump may include a power fluid intake configured to receive a power fluid and a produced fluid intake configured to receive a produced fluid. The power fluid intake may be in fluid communication with the submersible pump. The produced fluid intake may be in fluid communication with gas within the well. In an embodiment, the produced fluid intake may be in fluid communication with separated gas within an annulus of the well. The system may allow, among other things, a submersible pump (possibly an ESP) to be used in high GLR wells without installing a gas vent line.
In an embodiment, the jet pump may be positioned at the discharge of the submersible pump, and may use the fluid pumped by the submersible pump as a power fluid. In addition, a gas separator may be positioned upstream of the submersible pump. The gas separator may be configured to separate gas from liquid to produce separated gas and separated liquid. The separated liquid may be drawn into the submersible pump, while the separated gas may be segregated downstream within the annulus. The jet pump may then draw in the separated gas through the produced fluid intake, and later compress the gas and entrain the gas back into the separated fluid stream to be pumped to the surface. The use of a gas separator may reduce the amount of free gas that the submersible pump ingests and, as a consequence, may increase the performance of the submersible pump. Such a production system may be especially useful for wells with high GLR.
The system may allow a submersible pump and a jet pump to be combined into a single integrated system having the objective of economically producing a well without reducing the efficiency of the submersible pump or increasing the cost of the installation. The application of the system may increase the number of satellite wells that are able to use artificial lift to increase or maintain oil and gas flow rates, since high GLR wells may be produced using the system. Application of the production system may increase the profitability of future exploitation projects because it may be possible to increase the distance between the host platforms and the wells, which may result in a reduction of the number of host platforms needed. This new technology may be applied to any petroleum production well, but may have particular use in deep-water offshore exploitation.
Therefore, certain embodiments of the present production system may have one or more advantages. The system may provide an efficient artificial lift method for offshore and land (i.e., onshore) wells where the gas to oil ratio has increased past the operating limits of ESPs. Further, the system may provide an artificial lift method for deep offshore sub-sea wells without the need for a separate sub-sea gas vent line. The system may reduce power requirements for conventional ESP installations by reducing the required discharge pressure. The system may increase production rate by reducing the flowing bottom hole pressure in ESP wells. In addition, all elements of the downhole production system may be installed at once or at different times in the life of the well or wells being produced.
In many conventional ESP installations on integrated offshore platforms and onshore installations, gas from a reservoir is permitted to escape from the bottomhole fluids prior to its entering the submersible pump. This gas may be produced up the annulus as casinghead gas, and may be removed separately from the well at the casinghead, from which it may be directed into a separate pipeline from the produced fluids or vented. Because of the expense of a separate flow line and the environmental and/or safety concerns of venting, it may be beneficial to provide a way to produce these gases.
In an embodiment, the present production system may be used to produce such a well. That is, the production system may further include a casinghead valve configured to selectively permit gas within the annulus to pass into a conduit outside of the well. The conduit may be connected to a pipeline to be transported to a production facility, or to a vent. The casinghead valve may initially be open to permit casinghead gas to pass into the conduit. Subsequently, the casinghead valve may be closed to substantially prevent gas within an annulus of the well from escaping. Pressure within the annulus may be allowed to increase to a pre-determined pressure before initiating pumping of well fluids with the submersible pump. Once normal operation of the submersible pump and jet pump begins, the casinghead gas may be suctioned into the produced fluid intake of the jet pump, compressed, and entrained with the produced fluids pumped into the power fluid intake of the jet pump from the submersible pump.
Furthermore, an embodiment of a production system may be a packerless (i.e., open annulus) completion. That is, the annulus of the well defined between the production tubing string and the casing string may be devoid of isolation packers. It may be beneficial, however, to use isolation packers with wells, and thus the present production system may be used with such devices. Therefore, an embodiment of the production system includes an isolation packer positioned within an annulus of the well. The isolation packer may be positioned downstream of the jet pump and between a tubing string and a casing string within the well. The isolation packer may be used to trap well fluids and gases downhole of the packer. This configuration may reduce the pressure in the annulus gas with a corresponding decrease in flowing bottomhole pressure. Such a design may allow for the production of the well at higher rates if the pressure within the annulus upstream (e.g., downhole) of the packer is maintained above bubble point pressure.
In addition, an embodiment of a production system may combine a production system including a jet pump and a submersible pump with gas lift injection techniques. As noted above, gas lift is an artificial lift method in which gas is injected into the production tubing to reduce the fluid gradient of the fluids being produced. Gas lift processes may reduce the flowing bottomhole pressure, and thus the submersible pump discharge pressure and power requirements.
In an embodiment, the production system may include a gas lift injection system configured to inject gas within the well. The gas lift injection system may be further configured to inject gas into an annulus of the well. In such a configuration, the jet pump may be used as a substitute for the operating gas lift valve of a conventional gas lift injection assembly. Thus, gas injected into an annulus from the gas lift injection system may enter a tubing string within the well through the produced fluid intake of the jet pump to supply gas lift forces on fluids within the tubing, thereby reducing the flowing bottomhole pressure.
An embodiment of the production system may include at least one, and possibly a plurality of, gas lift valve(s) arranged downstream of the jet pump. The gas lift valves may further be arranged along the tubing string uphole of the jet pump. The gas lift valves may each be configured to selectively permit gas injected into the annulus to pass therethrough and, in an embodiment, to pass through the gas lift valves into the tubing string. That is, the gas lift valves may be configured to open and close to permit and prevent, respectively, fluids from passing therethrough under certain pre-determined conditions.
In another embodiment, the gas lift valves may be unloading gas lift valves. Thus, the gas lift valves may be used to unload liquid from the well to allow gas to be injected into the produced fluid intake of the jet pump. In such an unloading process, the fluid level may be above at least one, and possibly all, of the gas lift valves within the well. Gas may then be injected into the annulus of the well to depress the fluid level therein. As the fluid level within the well drops below each gas lift valve, the gas lift valves may each selectively permit gas injected into the annulus to enter the tubing, further aiding in the depression of the well fluid level. After injected gas has been selectively permitted to pass through each of the gas lift valves, the fluid level within the well may be lowered below the jet pump. The gas lift valves may remain closed when the fluid level within the well is below the jet pump (e.g., during normal operation of the production system), allowing substantially most or all of the injected gas to enter the tubing string through the jet pump.
Advantageously, gas injection into a jet pump as presented herein may allow for lower gas lift injection pressures or injection of gas at higher rates. In either case, the efficiency of such a system may be significantly improved over conventional gas lift installations.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSOther objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a bar graph showing the evolution of tracts receiving bids in recent Gulf of Mexico OCS lease sales.
FIG. 2 is a bar graph showing the percentage increase in production from Gulf of Mexico deep and ultra-deep waters in recent years.
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a deep-water hydrocarbon production system.
FIG. 4 is a graph of the multiphase flow correlation results for multiphase flow inside a tubing string.
FIG. 5 is a sketch of a liquid jet gas pump in accordance with an embodiment.
FIG. 6 is a graph comparing theoretical and experimental results for a liquid jet gas pump.
FIG. 7 is a graph of compression ratio versus volumetric ratio for a liquid jet gas pump.
FIG. 8 is a graph of efficiency versus jet pump number for a liquid jet gas pump.
FIG. 9 is a graph of tubing pressure with and without gas lift in the Marlin well.
FIG. 10 is an illustration of the front panel of a control/data acquisition system for the prototype test.
FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of a test loop used in the prototype test.
FIG. 12 is a diagram of the test well tubing string configuration.
FIG. 13 is a graph of pressure behavior results obtained during testing.
FIG. 14 is a graph of pressure behavior results obtained during testing.
FIG. 15 is a graph of flow rate behavior results obtained during testing.
FIG. 16 is a graph of the compression ratio versus the volumetric flow ratio for the test data.
FIG. 17 is a schematic diagram of a production system for producing fluids from a well in accordance with another embodiment.
FIG. 18 is a schematic diagram of a production system for producing fluids from a well in accordance with another embodiment.
FIG. 19 is a schematic diagram of a production system for producing fluids from a well in accordance with another embodiment.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description thereto are not intended to limit the invention to the particular form disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a deep-water hydrocarbon production system that includes an embodiment of a production system as described herein. Production system 100 may include a well 102 extending to an underground reservoir 104 . Perforations 106 may be present in the reservoir to aid in production of the well. A casing string 108 may extend to or above reservoir depth. Casing string 108 may include multiple casing strings of progressively smaller diameters. A tubing string 110 may be arranged within the casing string. An annulus 112 may be defined between casing string 108 and tubing string 110 . Tubing string 110 may extend, in an embodiment, to a depth above the bottom depth of casing string 108 . An artificial lift sub-assembly 114 may also be installed within the well, and in an embodiment may be installed below the fluid level within the well (not shown). A jet pump 116 may be located downstream (e.g., uphole) of artificial lift sub-assembly 114 . (As referred to herein, “downstream” and “upstream” may refer to the direction of flow from and towards, respectively, a reservoir. In predominantly vertically oriented wells such as well 102 , downstream may correspond to “uphole.&rdquo A wellhead 118 may be arranged on top of well 102 and above the sea floor. Production facilities 124 may be located away from the well in shallower waters than the well. A pipeline 120 may extend between wellhead 118 and production facilities 124 . An electrical cable 122 may also run between wellhead 118 and production facilities 124 .
Artificial lift sub-assembly 114 may include a submersible pump and, optionally, a gas separator. If present, the gas separator may be a rotary gas separator (RGS). The gas separator may be located immediately upstream of the submersible pump and, in an embodiment, may be located at the intake of the submersible pump. As stated above, artificial lift sub-assembly 114 may be located below the fluid level within well 102 . The well fluids at the bottom of well 102 and within reservoir 104 (“bottomhole fluids&rdquo may include liquids (both liquid hydrocarbons and water) and free gas. The gas separator may be configured to separate out a substantial portion, and possibly a majority, of the free gas within the bottomhole fluids. The free gas may be segregated up annulus 112 . It should be understood, however, that a gas separator is not required. Free gas may separate from the bottomhole fluids naturally with or without the use of a gas separator. Such natural separation and segregation of free gas up the annulus may, by itself, sufficiently reduce the GLR of the fluids entering the submersible pump. In either case, the free gas separated from the bottomhole fluids (whether by mechanical or natural means) may be considered separated gas, and the well production minus the free gas separated out (by, e.g., the gas separator and/or natural processes) may be considered separated fluid. The separated fluid may include liquid hydrocarbons, possibly derived from an oil-bearing reservoir adjacent the well (e.g., reservoir 104 ), and water. The separated fluid may also have particles (e.g., sediment) entrained therein. The separated gas may include gaseous hydrocarbons.
The separated fluids may be drawn into an intake of the submersible pump downstream. If a gas separator is present in the well, the separated fluids may be substantially gas-free. The separated fluids pumped by the submersible pump, however, may contain substantial quantities of dissolved gases. As with most centrifugal pumps, the performance of the electrical submersible pump may be deleteriously affected by the presence of free gas. By reducing the amount of free gas within the fluids ingested by the submersible pump, a gas separator may help to avoid a reduction of pump performance caused by the high GLR of gassy wells, and may increase the performance of the submersible pump.
The submersible pump may be an electrical submersible pump (ESP). The ESP may be a multistage centrifugal pump specifically designed to be installed inside the casing in petroleum wells below the liquid level. The ESP may be coupled to electrical cable 122 for receiving electrical power from, e.g., production facilities 124 . This electrical power may be used to drive a coupled electrical motor. The submersible pump may expel the separated fluids through an outlet port. The submersible pump is not required to be an ESP, but may instead be configured as other pump types, such as hydraulic submersible pumps.
As stated above, jet pump 116 may be located downstream (e.g., uphole) of the artificial lift sub-assembly, including the submersible pump. Jet pump 116 may be configured to allow the gases separated out by the gas separator and segregated up annulus 112 to be re-injected back into the separated fluids pumped by the submersible pump. Jet pump 116 may be arranged relatively deeply within well 102 to maximize the reduction in tubing flowing gradient provided during operation. The enlarged projection of jet pump 116 in FIG. 3 illustrates the features of jet pump 116 in more detail; further discussion of specific elements of jet pump 116 will be provided below.
The production system shown in FIG. 3 may be a packerless (i.e., open annulus) completion. That is, the well may not contain any sealing or isolation packers isolating one zone of the well from other zones. As will be shown below, a packer may, however, be used in an embodiment.
An embodiment of jet pump 116 is shown in more detail in FIG. 5 . The jet pump may be a liquid-jet gas pump (LJGP). Jet pump 116 may have no moving parts. Jet pump 116 may include a jet pump body 150 with a nozzle 152 , a throat 154 , and a diffuser 156 . Jet pump 116 may be set in a nipple inside tubing string 110 . Jet pump 116 may include a produced fluid intake 158 configured to receive a produced fluid 162 and a power fluid intake 160 configured to receive a power fluid 164 .
Power fluid 164 may be the same liquid pumped by the submersible pump (e.g., the separated fluids). Consequently, power fluid intake 160 may be in fluid communication with the submersible pump. In an embodiment, power fluid intake 160 is in fluid communication with a submersible pump outlet port through tubing 110 . Produced fluid intake 158 may be in fluid communication with produced gases 162 within well 102 and, in an embodiment, within annulus 112 of the well. The produced fluids may be the separated gas, e.g., the free gas separated out of the well fluids, possibly by a gas separator, and segregated up annulus 112 . If a gas separator is included as part of artificial lift sub-assembly 114 , produced fluid intake 158 may be in fluid communication with the gas separator. More specifically, produced fluid intake 158 may be in fluid communication with an outlet port of the gas separator through annulus 112 . As set forth herein, however, the phrase “in fluid communication” should not be construed to require that there is a direct connection between the elements stated to be “in fluid communication,” nor should it be construed to prohibit other elements from intervening therebetween; rather, two elements between which fluid can flow (i.e., communicate) may be deemed “in fluid communication” regardless of the mechanism of connection.
In FIG. 5 , lowercase subscripts denote primary points of interest. The “i” may indicate the inlet region of jet pump 116 , which may be the region inside the pipe prior to nozzle 152 . The “s” may indicate the pump suction region, which may be the region where the gas stream enters the device. The “n” may indicate the nozzle region. The “o” and “t” may indicate the beginning and the end of the throat region, respectively. The “m” may indicate the point in the throat (mixing zone 168 ) where the mixture between the two entering phases is completed, e.g., the point where the very first homogeneous mixture (bubbly mixture 170 ) appears. Finally, the letter “d” may indicate the diffuser region. From now on, in the nomenclature, a two-digit index will be adopted whenever useful. The first digit is a number and refers to the fluid, 1 to the liquid (e.g., the separated fluids), which will be considered incompressible, and 2 to the gas (e.g., the separated gas), which will be assumed ideal. The second letter indicates the point in the diagram as cited before. For example, V 1o indicates the liquid (index 1 ) velocity at the throat entrance (index o).
The liquid (e.g., separated fluids) may enter jet pump 116 through power fluid intake 160 . From there, the liquid may pass into nozzle 152 . The liquid may leave nozzle 152 as a liquid jet 166 and enter the throat region at point o. As the liquid passes through the nozzle, a low pressure region may be created. The low-pressure region may be connected to produced fluid intake 158 , which may in turn be connected to annulus 112 into which the separated gas (again, possibly the gas that has been separated by the gas separator from the well fluids prior to entering the submersible pump) has been segregated. Because of the reduced pressure around produced fluid intake 158 , the gas may be suctioned into the throat region of the jet pump.
Under normal operational conditions, liquid jet 166 may enter the throat region at a velocity V 1o . surrounded by a gas annulus 164 entering at V 2o . Such behavior has been observed in the experiments of Betzler 10 and Higgins 11 using a Plexiglas model of a liquid jet gas pump.
In an embodiment, there may be a distinct boundary between liquid jet 166 and gas annulus 164 at the beginning of the throat region. After a certain point, the phases may start to mix intimately in throat 154 and, if the throat is long enough, there may be a mixed fluid stream 172 exiting from jet pump 116 as a homogeneous bubbly mixture 170 . The homogeneous mixture of gas bubbles in liquid may be decelerated in the diffuser region. In the throat's mixing process, the transfer of momentum from the liquid may serve largely to compress the gas, in contrast with a liquid-liquid (LL) jet pump in which significant momentum transfer is involved in increasing the kinetic energy of the secondary liquid stream. The pressure recovery in diffuser 156 may be significantly reduced because the liquid may perform most of the work in compressing the entrained gas bubbles. The mixing process, in which the disintegrating liquid jet 166 may entrain, accelerate and compress the gas, may occur at a location in the throat region controllable by the discharge pressure, for a given nozzle rate Q 1 and a suction pressure P s . A high P d value may force early mixing; a lower pressure may move the mixing zone downstream.
Mixed fluid 172 , e.g., power plus produced fluids, shown exiting diffuser 156 in FIG. 5 may be the original well fluid since it is, in reality, the well liquid that has been pumped by the submersible pump, plus the well gas that has been pumped by the jet pump. The total well production (e.g., all the mixed fluid) may exit jet pump 116 through diffuser 152 into tubing string 110 with sufficient head to overcome the hydraulic head plus the head losses. The mixed fluid may travel into wellhead 118 and subsequently into pipeline 120 to be transported to production facilities 124 .
As noted above, in many conventional ESP installations on integrated offshore platforms and onshore installations, gas from a reservoir is permitted to escape from the bottomhole fluids prior to its entering the submersible pump. This gas may be produced up the annulus as casinghead gas, and may be removed separately from the well at the casinghead, from which it may be directed into a separate pipeline from the produced fluids or vented. Because of the expense of a separate flow line and the environmental and/or safety concerns of venting, it may be beneficial to provide a way to produce these gases.
FIG. 17 depicts a schematic view of a production system 200 that may be used to produce such a well in accordance with another embodiment. Production system 200 may include a well 202 extending to an underground reservoir 204 . Perforations 206 may be present in the reservoir to aid in production of the well. A casing string 208 may extend to or above reservoir depth. Casing string 208 may include multiple casing strings of progressively smaller diameters. A tubing string 210 may be arranged within the casing string. An annulus 212 may be defined between casing string 208 and tubing string 210 . Tubing string 210 may extend, in an embodiment, to a depth above the bottom depth of casing string 208 . An artificial lift sub-assembly 214 may also be installed within the well, and in an embodiment may be installed below the fluid level 226 within the well. The artificial lift sub-assembly may include a gas separator upstream of the submersible pump as described above. A jet pump 216 may be located downstream of artificial lift sub-assembly 214 . Components shown in FIG. 17 having similar reference numbers as components shown in FIG. 3 may constructed similarly and may perform in a similar manner as their counterpart components from FIG. 3 (e.g., jet pump 216 may perform similarly to jet pump 116 , and tubing 210 may be composed of the same materials as tubing 110 ). In addition, system 200 may include components of FIG. 3 that are not shown in FIG. 17 , such as a wellhead. Appropriate modifications may be made, however, to the design and/or function of each element in accordance with the particular conditions of each embodiment. Production system 200 may be implemented in offshore or onshore wells.
As shown in FIG. 17 , production system 200 may also include casinghead valve 211 connected to conduit 213 . Casinghead valve 211 may be configured to direct free gas (e.g., separated gas) within the annulus to a separate flow line or to a vent. More specifically, casinghead valve 211 may be configured to selectively permit gas within annulus 212 to pass into conduit 213 outside of well 202 . Conduit 213 may be in fluid communication with a pipeline to be transported to a production facility (e.g., production facilities 124 ) or to a vent. Casinghead valve 211 may initially be open to permit casinghead gas to pass from annulus 212 into conduit 213 . Subsequently, casinghead valve 211 may be closed to substantially prevent gas within annulus 212 of well 202 from escaping. Thus, the casinghead gas (e.g., separated gas) may be trapped within the well. Since closure of casinghead valve 211 may limit the means by which the casinghead gas may escape, the gas may accumulate within annulus 212 . During this time, the pressure within the annulus may increase as a result of gas accumulation. The time between closure of casinghead valve 211 and initiation of operation of the submersible pump of artificial lift subassembly 214 may be designed to allow pressure within annulus 212 to rise to a pre-determined level.
System 200 may then be operated in a manner similar to that described for system 100 . During operation, casinghead gas within annulus 212 may serve as a produced gas for jet pump 216 . Thus, the casinghead gas may be suctioned into a produced fluid intake of jet pump 216 , compressed, and entrained with the produced fluids pumped into a power fluid intake jet pump 216 from the submersible pump of artificial lift subassembly 214 in a manner similar to that described above with regard to system 100 .
As noted above, the present production system may be a packerless (i.e., open annulus) completion. It may be beneficial, however, to use packers in a well, and the present production system may be used with such devices.
FIG. 18 depicts a schematic view of a production system 300 in accordance with another embodiment. Production system 300 may include a well 302 extending to an underground reservoir 304 . Perforations 306 may be present in the reservoir to aid in production of the well. A casing string 308 may extend to or above reservoir depth. Casing string 308 may include multiple casing strings of progressively smaller diameters. A tubing string 310 may be arranged within the casing string. An annulus 312 may be defined between casing string 308 and tubing string 310 . Tubing string 310 may extend, in an embodiment, to a depth above the bottom depth of casing string 308 . An artificial lift sub-assembly 314 may also be installed within the well, and in an embodiment may be installed below a fluid level 326 within the well. The artificial lift sub-assembly may include a gas separator upstream of the submersible pump as described above. A jet pump 316 may be located downstream of artificial lift sub-assembly 314 . Components shown in FIG. 18 having similar reference numbers as components shown in FIG. 3 may constructed similarly and may perform in a similar manner as their counterpart components from FIG. 3 (e.g., jet pump 316 may perform similarly to jet pump 116 , and tubing 310 may be composed of the same materials as tubing 110 ). In addition, system 300 may include components of FIG. 3 that are not shown in FIG. 18 , such as a well head. Appropriate modifications may be made, however, to the design and/or function of each element in accordance with the particular conditions of each embodiment. Production system 300 may be implemented in offshore or onshore wells.
As shown in FIG. 18 , production system 300 may also include isolation packer 328 . Isolation packer 328 may be used to isolate an upper part of annulus 312 from a lower part for a variety of purposes, including broken casing or perforations that are to be isolated from the production zone. Isolation packer 328 may substantially prevent free gas flow up annulus 312 when well 302 is shut in, forcing the gas to instead accumulate below packer 328 .
System 300 may be operated in a manner similar to that described for system 100 . During operation, free gas (e.g., separated gas) within annulus 312 and below isolation packer 328 may serve as a produced gas for jet pump 316 . Thus, the separated gas may be suctioned into a produced fluid intake of jet pump 316 , compressed, and entrained with the produced fluids pumped into a power fluid intake of jet pump 316 from the submersible pump of artificial lift sub-assembly 314 as described above with regard to system 100 . Such a design may result in reduced pressure in the separated gas within annulus 312 , leading to a lower flowing bottomhole pressure. The pressure in the annulus below the packer may be maintained below bubble point pressure, which may allow producing the well at higher rates.
As noted above, the present production system may combine a production system including a jet pump and a submersible pump with gas lift injection techniques. Gas lift processes may incorporate several gas lift valves on the tubing string into which gas may be injected. These valves may be subdivided into unloading valves (of which there may be several) and an operating valve. Each valve may be set to open at a pre-determined differential pressure (e.g., pressure difference between the annulus and the tubing). More specifically, each valve may be a spring-loaded system, with the valve set to open at a predetermined differential pressure across the valve.
After a well incorporating gas lift valves has been shut in for a significant period of time, the fluid level within the well may rise above at least one, and possibly all, of the gas lift valves. The unloading valves may aid in lowering the fluid level below the bottommost operating gas lift valve, to allow for more efficient operation. The unloading process may begin by injecting gas into the annulus from a gas injection system outside of the well, pressurizing the annulus and increasing the differential pressure across the valves. As a result of this change in differential pressure between the annulus and production tubing, the valves may selectively open (depending on their respective settings), permitting gas from the annulus to enter the liquid column within the tubing and reducing the pressure at depth due to the weight of the tubing fluid column.
Preferably, the fluid level is pushed below each unloading valve sequentially. Each unloading valve may be designed to close when the next valve below it is opened. Finally, the fluid level is forced below the level of the operating valve and all the unloading valves are closed. From that point on, injected gas preferably enters the tubing through the operating gas lift valve.
FIG. 19 depicts a schematic view of a production system 400 in accordance with another embodiment in which gas lift injection techniques are incorporated into a production system including a jet pump and a submersible pump. Production system 400 may include a well 402 extending to an underground reservoir 404 . Perforations 406 may be present in the reservoir to aid in production of the well. A casing string 408 may extend to or above reservoir depth. Casing string 408 may include multiple casing strings of progressively smaller diameters. A tubing string 410 may be arranged within the casing string. An annulus 412 may be defined between casing string 408 and tubing string 410 . Tubing string 410 may extend, in an embodiment, to a depth above the bottom depth of casing string 408 . An artificial lift sub-assembly 414 may also be installed within the well, and in an embodiment may be installed below a fluid level 426 within the well. The artificial lift sub-assembly may include a gas separator upstream of the submersible pump as described above. A jet pump 416 may be located downstream of artificial lift sub-assembly 414 . Components shown in FIG. 19 having similar reference numbers as components shown in FIG. 3 may constructed similarly and may perform in a similar manner as their counterpart components from FIG. 3 (e.g., jet pump 416 may perform similarly to jet pump 116 , and tubing 410 may be composed of the same materials as tubing 110 ). In addition, system 400 may include components of FIG. 3 that are not shown in FIG. 19 , such as a well head. Appropriate modifications may be made, however, to the design and/or function of each element in accordance with the particular conditions of each embodiment. Production system 400 may be implemented in offshore or onshore wells.
As shown in FIG. 19 , production system 400 may also include gas lift injection system 430 . Gas injection system 430 may be configured to inject gas lift gases into well 402 , and preferably into annulus 412 . In an embodiment, jet pump 416 may be substituted for the operating gas lift valve of a conventional gas lift injection assembly. Thus, gas injected into annulus 412 from gas lift injection system 430 may enter tubing string 410 within well 402 through the produced fluid intake of jet pump 416 to supply gas lift forces to fluids within tubing 410 . Gas injection system 430 may be arranged outside of the well above ground level (e.g., above the sea floor for offshore wells, above surface level for onshore wells).
Production system 400 may also include at least one, and preferably several, gas is lift valves 432 . Gas lift valves 432 may further be arranged along tubing string 410 uphole of jet pump 416 . The gas lift valves may each be configured to selectively permit gas injected into annulus 412 to pass therethrough and, in an embodiment, to pass through the gas lift valves into tubing string 410 . That is, gas lift valves 432 may be configured to open and close to allow and prevent, respectively, fluids from passing therethrough under certain pre-determined conditions.
In a further embodiment, gas lift valves 432 may be unloading gas lift valves. Thus, the gas lift valves may be used to unload well 402 to allow gas to be injected into the produced fluid intake of jet pump 416 . In such an unloading process, fluid level 426 may be above at least one, and possibly all, of gas lift valves 432 . Gas may be injected into annulus 412 to depress fluid level 426 . As fluid level 426 within well 402 drops below each gas lift valve 432 , the gas lift valves may each selectively permit gas injected into annulus 412 to enter tubing 410 , further aiding in the depression of the well fluid level. Gas lift valves 432 may open once a pre-determined differential pressure level across each valve is reached, allowing injected gas to enter tubing 410 . After injected gas as been selectively permitted to pass through each of gas lift valves 432 , the fluid level within well 402 may be lowered below jet pump 416 (as shown in FIG. 19 ). Gas lift valves 432 may remain closed when fluid level 426 is below jet pump 416 (e.g., during normal operation of the production system), allowing substantially all of the injected gas to enter tubing string 410 through jet pump 416 . Gas lift valves 432 , however, are not required to be closed during normal operation of system 400 ; e.g., one or more of the valves may be set to be open during such time. Once pumped to the surface, the injected gas may be separated out by a gas separator above the surface and re-injected into the well.
Because, among other things, jet pump 416 may compress injected gas, system 400 may be significantly more efficient than conventional gas lift systems. As noted above, system 400 may allow for the use of lower gas injection pressures than conventional gas lift systems to achieve similar results (possibly as low 30-40% of the injection pressure needed if a conventional operating gas lift valve were used in place of the jet pump). Alternately, gas injection into a jet pump as presented herein may allow for injection of gas at higher rates.
System --
meine Meinung, aus meiner Sicht, so wie ich das sehe ;-)
|
|
Von Siggi | Erstellt am: 11.04.08 18:37 | Beitrag Nr.: 129.278 | Weitere Beiträge |
| Diesen Beitrag: | ||||
